Model
of
Reality.org
your guide to...  
Intermittent Electron Theory
Photoelectric Resonance...
|
|
|
Non-Radiating Planetary Atom...
|
|
|
Pulsating Particles Interfere...
|
|
|
keywords: andrew ancel gray andrew gray andrew a. gray austin, texas austin, tx quantum replacement avtec corp. avtec corporation Intermittent electron theory is a way to explain microscopic physics without the use of photons. Instead, a dynamic model for the electrons structure is used, where the electron periodically turns its electric field on and off. The frequency of the electrons field pulsation is given by a De Broglie-like formula. Both the emission and the absorption of light can then be explained by using the physics of pulsating charges emitting and absorbing electromagnetic radiation. In the photoelectric effect, the electrons acceleration is found to cease just after the electrons pulsation frequency is synchronized with the incoming light wave (eliminating the need for photons in absorption). In the bremsstrahlung x-ray cutoff experiment, the pulsating bremsstrahlung electrons have a Nyquist frequency limit in their radiating capability, as pulsating charges have this natural limit due to chopping (eliminating the need for photons in emission). A planetary model for the atom is possible using an intermittent electron and a nucleus modeled with intermittent protons. In this way, an electron can circulate the nucleus by synchronizing its on time with the nuclear off time. Since the electron is off while the nucleus is on (and vice versa), then no centripetal radiation is emitted because the electron is not accelerated while its electric field is on (only while it is off). The resonance frequencies of hydrogen would then simply be the orbital frequencies of the planetary electrons, which would radiate at these resonance frequencies when thermally disturbed. In metallic solids, these atoms would have outer electron orbitals with infrared frequencies that would naturally emit infrared radiation when thermally disturbed. As the solid is heated, the more violent thermal agitations would disturb deeper electron orbitals with higher frequencies. The issue of entanglement and the EPR paradox can be resolved because the necessity for the inclusion of photons in the theory is eliminated. Also, the significance of Bells theorem changes since the entangled light pulses are not described as discreet photons but randomly sized electromagnetic light wave pulses with much different probability distributions. Finally, several experiments are suggested that would prove this theory to be correct.
www.cplta.com now is Wilco Tennis. Contact Andrew Gray for Wilco Tennis.